AUTHOR PAGE FOR HOWARD DENSON

Blog

view:  full / summary

Evil begets evil

Posted by Howard Denson on August 16, 2017 at 12:30 AM Comments comments (0)

By HOWARD DENSON

Unfortunately, we Americans have never had much of a sense of history. We knock down buildings that have been around a little too long for our taste (which is minimal). We erect new buildings that have all the design aestheticism of airport terminals.

.

This slapdash approach to life carries over into our sense of history, and, as the American Taliban asserts itself, we divide historical objects into two categories: those without sin and worthy of homage vs. those sinful images that are an abomination in the sight of the Almighty (except the Almighty doesn’t exist in their view, but they’ll provide the Omniscience anyway).

.

When you visit London and get the quick tour-bus orientation, the tour guide will point to a building and say, “And right here is where King Charles was executed.” He stepped out of a window onto a platform that had been constructed for the occasion, and, when the axeman snicked off his head, the crowd groaned.

.

The Brits remember that. If you are a royalist, it is a great tragedy. If you were a puritan then, it was probably a whack too much, but, for all of his faults, Oliver Cromwell brought forth many useful reforms. If nothing else, his political party reminded monarchs that they could lose their heads if they strayed too far.

.

In Rome, they will point to a balcony on the third or fourth floor and say that’s where Mussolini harangued the crowd about how great Italian fascism would be. In the small village of Giulino di Mezzegra in northern Italy, you will find a marker for where Mussolini and his lady friend were hung like beeves after being executed in1945.

.

In Paris, they point to where the notorious prison, the Bastille, was located. After the revolutionaries stormed the Bastille, they dismantled the structure, little realizing how much of a tourist attraction it could be. I don’t recall similar attention being paid to the sites where the guillotines were utilized as they carried out their plans of reducing the powerful by a head’s length . . . and later as they used the guillotines on their former comrades. It was whacking good fun and enabled us humans to do what we do best: destroy and kill.

.

All of that, of course, brings us to the villains of 2017, the Confederacy, and the sanctified are joyously pulling down statues and huffing and puffing about how righteous we will become. We could focus on social inequality, pollution, financial and banking corruption, the infrastructure, and constructing a health care system that actually works, but, face it, that would take energy and commitment.

.

Besides the long-dead Confederates, the sanctified rail against Evangelicals because they are allegedly 100 percent racist.

.

They aren’t, of course. I’m uncomfortable around worshippers who want to wash my feet, talk in tongues, and especially handle snakes that rattle. Despite these characteristics, however, evangelicals are not evil.

.

A modern American Talibanist will protest there is no such thing as evil. There is. Yes, indeed, there very much is evil.

.

Evangelicals may have a few among them who want to don hoods or swastikas and attack those who attack statues or their own vision of what America should be. Yet, many, many more evangelicals simply worship in their, ah, enthusiastic way and obey the same amount of laws that you and I obey.

.

Sometimes it’s a social prejudice. These are largely poorer people (“white trash, that’s what” ), and the socially superior sniff with unjustifiable disdain.

.

The Roman Catholic Church has centuries of mistreatment of people. Even if we focus only on the 20th Century in the U.S., we see its hierarchy turned a blind eye to sexual abuse of the boys, and girls, of the church.

.

The Anglican Church, the Church of England, had its islands of respectability, but still sat silent while massacres occurred in India, Ireland, etc.

.

The bottom line is this: Evil begets evil.

.

Although a victim of evil may in turn inflict evils upon his or her contemporaries, evil raises a banner to alert others to goosestep in imitation.

.

The American Talibans like to post pictures of Ku Klux Klan members carrying torches . . . or Nazis having torches and bonfires of burning books behind them. A protest today is mere imitation of them.

.

But evil begets evil, and the Middle Eastern terrorists are providing as much inspiration as the KKK or neo-Nazis. Let’s look at Mexico, where drug lords dominate regions as much as the warlords dominate Afghanistan. When the Mideast terrorists wish to frighten people, they cut off heads and hands (easily accomplished with primitive swords). In Mexico, the drug terrorists would attack a group of police or soldiers and chop off their heads, leaving them lined up across the road just as Vlad the Impaler warned invading armies by showing what awaits them. Mideastern terrorists lacking an army can rely on cars and trucks to plow into people. God is great? Well, God is great in giving free will to those who wish to beget evil.

.

It’s unfair to attack Donald Trump for not responding effectively. After all, the voters on the right or those who wanted a change knew that he was, and is, all hat and no cattle. He talks a good game about how business-like he is. (He isn’t.) Some Ministers of the Popular Gospel on Cable TV like to compare him to Jesus or the disciples and warn that an attack on him is like an attack on God. (Neither is true. Besides King Charles stepped out on the platform arguing that he was put on the throne by God and all that.) If anything, Trump is closer to Pontius Pilate. He's aware that something is awry, but can't quite put his finger on it.

.

Nothing that Trump could say will mollify his critics (including yours truly), not when he takes a position at, say, 9 a.m. on a Monday, takes an opposing position by noon on a Tuesday, and so on.

.

Scroll down and you'll see my argument about Trump's inability to say the right thing.

When Trouble Knocks on Your Door

Posted by Howard Denson on July 21, 2017 at 4:25 PM Comments comments (0)

By HOWARD DENSON

I spent decades relaying tips to colleagues who were under fire . . . and eventually learned to say up front, “I’m not a rescuer. All I can do is help you organize your thoughts and speak to you honestly.”

.

Tip #1: Never ever write anything in anger. Your angry words will do more harm than good.

.

Tip #2: Never write anything that is false. Those higher up the chain of command may get away with fibbing here and there, but you don’t have that luxury. One demonstrably false statement from you undercuts your position.

.

Tip #3: Write something and set it aside. Very likely it doesn’t have to go out today.

.

Tip #4: Get someone you trust to read what you’ve written to see if you have said what you need to say.

.

Tip #5: Be a model employee as much as you are capable of being. No one of us is an angel, but we can avoid stabbing ourselves in our own backs.

.

Tip #6: If an evaluation has zinged you for A, B, C, then focus your efforts on resolving those problems.

.

I helped one colleague from another campus respond to a 12-point complaint from his supervisor. The dispute went on for a couple of years before the colleague resigned an hour before the board would vote on his termination. When the dust settled, I re-read my copy of the 12-point complaint. Each point was on target, as I might have known if I had been working on the same campus with him. I had not understood that my colleague wanted to be thrown out. He was tired of the job, but he didn’t have the spark to simply resign and move on. Now, I open any confidential chit-chat with this question: “Do you really want to keep this job . . . or are you just doing it for the money?”

.

Tip #7: If a supervisor has gone off the reservation (e.g., by claiming that 90% of students in a class should pass), bring the assertion to the attention of, say, a faculty senate or members of a department. Discuss it with an apologetic and respectful tone and do not use the name of the supervisor. At some point, the chain of command should recognize that the supervisor’s assertion is silly and unsupportable.

.

Tip #8: Keep the problem out of the social media. In my collection of essays in the Wild-Eyed Moderate series, I discuss the parable of the chickens. If chickens (your friends and colleagues) see blood, they will peck the spot until the chicken is fatally wounded. (What? Your buddies are more than just chickens? No, they aren’t. Trust me.)

.

Tip #9: Keep a chronology of disputes and have a series of folders devoted to aspects of the dispute. If you have a meeting with someone, immediately write a “memo to myself” (as they were termed during John Dean’s Watergate testimony...James Comey has a different name for them, but they serve the same purpose.)

.

The memos will accomplish two things:

.

First, they will provide a record of what occurred, and, if necessary, the chronology will help an attorney or yourself at any in-house or state hearing.

.

Second, the memo process will force you to think about what you are saying and doing.

.

Tip #10: “It’s not fair” isn’t a defense. Most people in the private sector may be fired without much cause. Adjuncts and annual contract teachers don’t have any rights other than the right to finish a contract. Their contracts contain loopholes large enough to drive semis through, with management being in the semi.

.

Tip #11: When you protest a practice, you may not help yourself, but you may make it easier for another person down the road.

 


Saying the right thing

Posted by Howard Denson on June 9, 2017 at 10:20 AM Comments comments (0)


By HOWARD DENSON

ONE OF MOTHER’S FRIENDS has dropped by for a visit, and a child goes up to her and asks, “Is it true, like Mama tells Daddy, that you’ve slept with every man in town?”

..

It takes time for a child to learn that there are certain things that you just don’t say.

..

When that child is seventy years old and president of the U.S., it is mind-boggling.

..

Normally, when one reaches the Oval Office, he becomes an effective communicator. Some are like FDR, JFK, Reagan, Clinton, and Obama and make observers jealous of their abilities. Most are like Truman, Ike, LBJ, Nixon, and the Bushes—able to deliver a good speech, but uneven overall.

..

Die-hard defenders of Trump engage in sophistry as they whistle past the cemetery wherein DT’s crypt is located: “He’s brilliant, really great in reaching the people, outstanding.”

..

Of course, he’s not.

..

He’s a con artist, a freak-show hawker, shouting anything to the masses to get them to surrender their dollar and come inside to see the two-headed mermaid. He’s the deal-maker who says Anything to close the deal. Lies aren’t just second nature to him. They are first, second, through tenth nature.

..

What compounds his problem is that he used to be able to get away with lies, a little bluster here, some school-yard bullying there, and he gets his way. When things didn’t work out, all right, he’d have to pay, say, ten cents on the dollar.

..

This creature in the Oval Office has more in common with the child blurting out embarrassments than to other gentlemen who have occupied his position. One difference: The child was not lying but trying to clarify something Mama said.

..

He simply is unable to come up with the right words. Why? Because all words have to be about him, and he will say anything to make himself look good.

..

Dubya Bush was not noted for being eloquent. He was screwing up regarding Katrina. He was telling Brownie he was doing a great job when he wasn’t. After September 11 and Dubya’s visit to the disaster site, the media began giving him points for saying the right thing and doing the right thing. Mayor Rudy Giuliani earned even higher points for his ability to say the right thing.

..

At the time, I wasn’t impressed by their words—which were so-so at best. I did recall a time when I couldn’t find the right words. A colleague would lose a parent, and I’d immobilize myself because I didn’t know the right words to say.

..

When we siblings lost our own parent and went through the visitation experience at the funeral home, I learned that practically any words will do: “I’m sorry for your loss,” “he was a good man and we’ll miss him,” “hang in there, things will get better for you,” etc. Anything from the heart was just fine.

..

I got to wondering what Dubya or a mayor could have said that would be totally inappropriate, and it took a long time to come up with an example. The unsuitable words would have to come from, say, Andrew Dice Clay, the persona created by the macho comedian: “Wow, look at that. I bet those firefighters and cops are nothing more than a smear of mayonnaise now.”

..

Righteous howls of protest about insensitivity would rattle the windows of Manhattan, even though the Dice man might have been 100 percent correct.

..

Children have the ability to mature and to learn new skills. As they become young or older adults, they note wise sayings: “The shame is not in falling down but in failing to get up,” etc. When Nixon narrowly lost the 1960 election to Kennedy, he engaged in a fearless inventory of his skills . . . or lack thereof. He bottomed out when he lost to Pat Brown in the race to be governor of California (“you won’t have Nixon to kick around anymore” ).

..

But he got better before the TV cameras and was able to win the 1968 nomination and then the presidency (all the while avoiding any debates).

..

Trump has yet to show that he can learn anything new, and that means America is in trouble.

.

"I'm sorry you lost your mother, kid. It must hurt, but your hurt, everyone's hurt, would be a lot worse if I died."

.

--30--

 

 

 

 

How to win friends and converts

Posted by Howard Denson on June 6, 2017 at 10:15 AM Comments comments (0)

By HOWARD DENSON


FEAR NOT. I WILL NOT come by your dwelling on a “visitation night” and exhort you to accept my faith or political position. I won’t for a couple of reasons.

.

First, I respect your privacy and, in turn, expect you to keep your yap shut and not harangue me about things political and metaphysical.

.

Second, frankly I don’t give a celestial flip about what you believe. You may support practically any candidate without my fretting much. If we don’t get Harry, Ike, Jack, Lyndon, and so on, then Dewey, Adlai, Dick, Barry, and so on would probably do just fine. After all, it’s not likely that you are going to support a deranged nincompoop for president. We don’t have to worry about a total incompetent becoming POTUS.

.

Having said that, I do follow tactics and strategies, those used by generals, corporate execs, and even coaches, but especially those used by political parties, churches, and sects overseas. Some policies work, while others are self-defeating.

.

Let’s focus on the latter, particularly the activities of the boneheads amongst Islamic extremists.

.

When we have individuals blowing themselves up, driving cars and trucks into pedestrians, and firing at people in a mall or the like, we could say we have mini-wars, except that it too grandiose a term for their feeble activities.

.

If we examine some directory that discusses the spectrum of war and fighting in our global military-industrial complex, the terrorists barely make the grade. Their equivalent in commerce is the dollar store. In social organizations their equal is the Flat Earth Society.

.

To be sure, the heads of various groups realize this. They have looked at their available materiel for a functioning army. “We don’t have tanks . . . we don’t have fighter planes . . . we don’t have ships . . . in short, we got plenty of nothing.”

.

What do they have? Uncle Ismael’s Toyota truck, machine-guns, AK-47s, and (oh, yes) some clowns who can be talked into blowing themselves up.

.

If a region can no longer make a decent claim for nationhood (e.g., Syria, Somalia, etc.), radical groups can destabilize whatever order exists.

.

However, for the U.K., France, the rest of Europe, the U.S., and much of the world, they are wasting their time.

.

If individuals wish to proclaim that Allah is great and all-powerful, they strike out as they blow off their nuts, arms, and legs. They are saying, “My god is weak and powerless, but He can be all-powerful if I blow my ass up.”

.

Theologically, of course, that narcissistic position doesn’t hold water.

.

Who would buy into such a message? Ah, the young males, of course, the epitome of the self-absorbed. They aren’t respected as adults. They aren’t respected as undergraduates or for their menial jobs. They aren’t getting any women. But, no matter, this cool guy explains how they will show the world. The clown decides, “That beautiful girl in the florist shop will want to have it on with me after I blow my nuts off.”

.

The logic behind part of the campaign is “We want our faith to prevail and to show the infidels what they need to believe.”

.

That, of course, won’t work because the approach lacks any appeal. Can you imagine a neighbor shouting, “You there, you Methodist, become a Presbyterian like me or I’ll blow myself up. Okay, I’ll blow myself up close to you.”

.

In the bad ol’ days, Christians were cruel as they forced pagans from Africa, Asia, South America, etc. to accept Christianity or else. The ineffectual Christian male in recent times finds great comfort in blowing up a federal building, killing hundreds, or shooting dozens in a church or a (gasp, gasp) gay nightclub. It will take more than a can of Brasso to remove the incrustations on those individuals’ haloes.

.

Many others turn to a faith because of its natural appeal: Moses was the law-giver (in the spirit of Hammurabi), Jesus laid out a gentle message in his Sermon on the Mount, the Buddha had wise precepts. Confucius clicks because (darn it all) he’s probably smarter than Charlie Chan.

.

Look at the numbers. Christianity, with all its divisions, has about 2.4 billion followers. Islam comes in second with 1.8 billion believers, while Hinduism comes in third with a billion adherents. All of them preach peace and harmony, and all have a miniscule number of clowns who think the greatest act in the world would be to kill [you fill in the blank].

.

People turn to many faiths because they provide a need and help to give internal peace . . . not because they terrorize.

.

Now . . . violence can have an effect, right?

.

If you carpet-bomb and create firestorms as at Dresden, Tokyo, etc., you will drive a side to surrender.

.

On the other hand, when you nip at an opponent with a runaway truck here, a suicide bomb there, and so on, you are only reinforcing the other side’s desire to resist. All of the bombing of England during the Battle of Britain only made the victims furious. It wasn’t enough to get them to consider surrendering.

.

Just consider what it would take to bring America to her knees. We are a violent nation, spawned by the myth of the gun-totin’ cowboys. We have nutcases bursting into their former places of employment and killing as many as they can in revenge. We tsk-tsk, but Wayne LePew of the National Irrational Rifle, Gun, and Bee-bee Gun Assn. will warn us not to weaken the Second Amendment. A nutter bursts into a school and kills dozens. Other nutters say it never happened. It was faked so the gubmint could weaken the Second Amendment.

.

We are the land of the free, the brave, and extreme weather. Tornadoes rip across our country, destroying billions in property damage, killing dozens to hundreds, but we don’t require every school to have reinforced storm rooms or every dwelling to be constructed to lessen the effects of wind.

.

Violence really doesn’t bother us. It’s good for a few images on the news, but not enough for us to take protective actions. It's our daily visit to the Roman Coliseum to a fight to the death or two before supper.

.

If we can tolerate all that, then all that clowns with bombs are doing is making pulled pork out of themselves.

--30-- 


Erase the Civil War?

Posted by Howard Denson on May 17, 2017 at 12:55 AM Comments comments (0)

By HOWARD DENSON

.

FOR THE RECORD, I grew up fascinated by the Civil War and identified completely with the valiant soldiers of the Confederacy, and, when I read about their exploits, I admired the bravery of the Union soldiers, too.

.

There were many things about the Civil War that I did not know.

.

First, I bought into the rhetoric that the war was about states’ rights, state sovereignty, and self-determination. The argument went thusly: It was not about slavery; it was about the larger issues of independence. It took years for me to learn that the view was hooey.

.

Second, although I knew about the nasty internecine fighting in bloody Kansas and Missouri leading up to the war, I believed that volunteers signed up willingly and went off for glory or, more likely, death or serious injury.

.

Third, I had heroes. Robert E. Lee was one. Stonewall Jackson was impressive, but Jefferson Davis struck me as quirky. I was a kid in the 1940s, so I knew the U.S. needed to be one country, so my admiration extended to Abraham Lincoln.

.

Fourth, I did not believe the Southerners were traitors but believed they had a right to secede.

.

Fifth, I was taught that the former slaves were attacking whites during Reconstruction, which was a wicked institution. The blacks in the Reconstruction era state legislatures were uneducated “darkies,” talking like Uncle Remus to each other.

.

Now, let’s have some time pass, along with much time spent reading Bruce Catton and dozens of other Civil War historians and commentators.

.

What emerged that was different?

.

Well, no one was emphasizing that, beginning about 1863, Southerners were infuriated with the Confederacy. They had been lied to repeatedly. The war was of, for, and by the slave class, the plantation owners, who lied to entice white farmers to be their cannon fodder. “If you enlist, don’t worry about your family. We’ll raise enough vegetables to feed your family.” They didn’t. They planted cotton and tobacco and put the proceeds in their bank accounts. If soldiers deserted to help their family, they were apt to be shot or hanged . . . or depicted as white trash villains.

.

By 1865 when the end came, Southerners knew it had been a rich man’s war but a poor man’s fight . . . and they were furious.

.

This anger continued for fifteen years, basically a generation. In the 1890s, a great P.R. project was underway. Jefferson Davis had every right to pen his version of the history of the lost cause. Efforts were made to honor the soldiers, and town squares began featuring statues of Johnny Reb. Everything was romanticized and ennobled. The Klan changed from a vicious band of plantation owners into a noble group fighting against the wicked dark man who has gotten out of control.

.

That is the romanticized version that was handed over to my generation and later ones.

.

One book helped to bring things into focus for me: F. N. Boney’s Southerners All. He focused on “Rednecks,” “the Bourgeoisie,” and “Blacks” of the antebellum South. He was not the first to argue that these major groups of Southerners were neither as separated from one another nor as alienated from each other and other Americans as they were often depicted.

.

When it seemed possible that the rednecks and poor whites in the South might find a natural alliance with the freed men and former slaves, the Big Mules destroyed the potential alliance by lynchings and racist rhetoric. In some form or another, this divide and conquer strategy is still being used.

.

When I actually read the Constitution of the Confederate States of America (it was devised quite late and had no real impact), I saw that the new nation was founded on the notion that it MUST protect slavery. When I read the statements following votes to secede, each emphasized the importance of slavery. In short, the Civil War was ABOUT slavery. When Southerners were talking about protecting our way of life, they meant protecting slavery. When they spoke of states’ rights, they essentially meant that "we have the right to murder and hang our darkies, and you keep out of our business."

.

Moreover, the secession votes often were not unanimous affairs. South Carolina was bat-guano crazy, but about 40 percent of the delegates from Alabama opposed secession. Other states came reluctantly to the vote. Along this line, Ken Burns’ otherwise excellent series on the Civil War devoted scant (if any) time to the pro-Unionist Southerners.

.

When it came time for enlistments, in my neck of the woods, the recruitment went like this: “Are you going to join the CSA Army . . . or would you prefer to be shot, hanged, or thrown off a cliff?”

.

In my allied families, the Stephensons and their neighbors in Winston County the Blevinses had sons join the Union Army, figuring, “If I’m going to be shot at, I might as well be shot fighting for the Union.” Their fathers had fought with Andy Jackson, and Abe Lincoln "hadn’t never done nothing agin them."

.

The rest of my allied families, the Densons, O’Rears, Prices, Burdettes, Lollars, and others wore uniforms for the Confederacy . . . or at least were in the Home Guard (for old men and boys).

.

Were they traitors? No, although the rhetoric that prevails today argues that they are. Why weren’t they traitors? Simple, the U.S. Constitution did NOT forbid secession. It did not address the issue.

.

In fact, the Declaration of Independence was nothing more than a SECESSION document:

.

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

.

By 1865, the Civil War itself wrote a Constitutional Amendment in Blood (thanks to the deaths of about 750,000 Americans all): No state may secede.

.

Until slavery was struck down, the U.S. Constitution was pro-Slavery. The Supreme Court largely was taking pro-slavery interpretations of law and statutes. Even so, the South saw the end of slavery down the road as new states were admitted and managed to restrict or prevent slavery in their borders. Would the coup de grâce have occurred twenty years in the future? By 1880? Perhaps 1900? Ironically, they drove the nail in the coffin of slavery by trying to leave the U.S.A.

.

With them OUT of the Union, they were no longer protected by the U.S. Constitution. Moreover, they were out of the Union and could not vote on amendments to abolish slavery.

.

Now, today citizens want to tear down monuments to Lee and other Confederates, traitors all, some say.

.

However, when the statues are removed, we also remove memories of why the war was fought. Someone may argue, “To hell with old wars, let’s focus on peace.”

.

Fair enough. Let’s focus on the peace-makers. One of those was Robert E. Lee, who did NOT urge his soldiers to fade into the hills and conduct a guerilla war until the U.S. tired of the factious Southerners and simply let them go.

.

Let’s erect MORE statues: Let’s have a statue honoring the Underground Railway. Harriett Tubman in this park; someone else in another park. For the black soldiers who went to their deaths (as in Glory), let’s honor them for they gave blood and heart to the country.

.

If a Southern park has a statue of Lee, it likely has room for one of Grant (a long-time opponent of slavery, although he married into a pro-slavery family).

.

Should there be a statue to the Abolitionist? Perhaps. Today, we assume that people back then were either pro-slavery or abolitionists. They weren’t. Abolitionist was a dirty word in most circles. The North didn’t want an invasion of freed blacks, either before or after the war.

.

Let’s have a statue of an early teacher, one from the Reconstruction era. Most whites in those days argued for the blacks to be freed, but, of course, that didn’t mean they were equal. Their most progressive thinking was trying to figure out a way to get them back to Africa.

.

Slave owners didn’t want blacks educated because they might communicate with each other and write themselves passes to enable them to escape to the North.

.

When we read some of the embarrassing remarks Lincoln said about blacks, we often forget that, if he spoke like a true abolitionist, he wouldn’t have been elected president. In addition, he was exposed to eloquent blacks such as Frederick Douglas, but he had never been exposed to a black educated class.

.

So, what else have I learned that’s different? For one things, the so-called "darkies" in the state legislature was false. The men selected to be in the Reconstruction legislatures were often well educated, teachers, medical men, ministers, etc.

.

Oh, thanks to Ancestry.Com, I also learned that I am between 1-2 percent Sub-Saharan African (the swath that includes Mali and Senegal). I laugh to imagine my 15-year-old self trying to get his head around that information.


Ruminations of a Florida cowboy philosopher

Posted by Howard Denson on April 3, 2017 at 11:40 AM Comments comments (0)


By HOWARD DENSON

.

The boss has told us that we can’t argue politics in the bunkhouse any more. The latest fracas began when One-Eye Indiana said that supporters of our current president are prone to violence, whereupon Crazy Lipschitz of Waco beat the crap out him with a branding iron.

.

So I can’t pitch my ideas out any more and have to punch them into the laptop.

**

NO, NO, NO! -- When we talk about deporting (i.e., expelling) unwanted individuals, we must look at the Ancient Greeks and their system of ostracism. Since we have a population of 310-311 million (or whatever), the vote in favor of expelling must be higher. Ostracism would expel somebody from the polis for ten years. During that time, others would have to leave the person’s property and family alone. They could ostracize the corrupt (as with Themistocles--think LBJ) or the virtuous (Aristides the Just). Why the latter? His very virtue could cause a civil disturbance, etc.

.

Since Hillary and the Donald received in the neighborhood of 60 million votes, I suggest the ostracism figure be higher, say, 30 or 40 million.

.

Now . . . I am a reasonable person so there is another approach: the one used with Socrates.

.

Here a jury of 500 men tried him on charges of being impious and corrupting the minds of the youth. Certainly the Donald is guilty of both charges, particularly the corruption angle (and not just the youth).

.

His jury should consist of 250 supporters of Hillary and Bernie and 250 supporters who voted for the Great Fizzle Himself.

.

Start the voting . . . and someone mix up a batch of hemlock.

**

FORGET TO SIGN EXECUTIVE ORDER? – The reporters calling out questions got under the skin of the Great Fizzle Himself, so he left a signing ceremony for an executive order without signing the order.

.

Any other President and his staff would have had someone repeatedly announce, “This is a signing of an Executive Order, not a press conference.” If questions persisted, the prez could say, over and over, “No comments. Save them for a press conference. . . no comment,” etc.

.

However, when you and your staff are incompetent nincompoops, then . . .

**

LONG JOURNEY & MILES TO GO – Today I finished the very rough first draft of THE MICHELANGELO OF MARSAY. It will be about the size (though certainly not the quality) of THE GREAT GATSBY. It began in the first person point of view back in December 2002. After 700 words, it switched over to 3rd person point of view. During January-February 2003, it grew to 9,000 words . . . and hit a wall. In a few months in 2007, it crept up to fewer than 12,000 words. And it sat there for ten years.

.

Two months ago, I added an interesting character, and, damned if things didn’t explode. The word count is now almost 55,500.

.

When polished, will the final draft be more like Twain-Hemingway-Faulkner?

.

No, always Twain, of course, but maybe more Fannie Flagg and William Saroyan.

**

A BUMPKIN ON TV -- Cherish the moment. It isn’t often that you get to reveal yourself as a total idgit on nationwide TV. This happened to a rube who couldn’t figure out what President Obama was up to when 9/11 occurred. On a scale of 1-10 (dumb to dumbest), this guy’s an 11.

**

WILL RUSSIAN HACKERS CORRUPT THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE TO SWING ELECTIONS? -- The U.S. Electoral College is already corrupt and it has failed to work properly in 40 percent of elections from 2000 to 2016. It has given us a gerrymandered result on two recent elections. If foreign agents, such as the KGB, the Russian kleptocrats, and the mob, wish to influence our elections, they can focus on the key states in the E.C. They apparently did this and helped to elect the Great Fizzle Himself, not particularly because they were so enamored with him (the jury is still out), but because they could throw off the democratic republican results in our country.

.

Such strategies can be used against Democrats or Republicans, so it serves all Americans well for protections to be put in place.

.

I won’t suggest any retaliatory actions since, if implemented, our government should be in a position to be as nonchalant as a house cat with a single yellow feather barely sticking out of its mouth.

.

Instead, let’s put our emphasis on using the popular vote as the standard for electing our president. Although Hillary was subjected to slime attacks from the Ersatz House Committee on Benghazi, she was regularly bombarded with outrageous slimeball attacks from the old Soviet regions (even being accused of cannibalism, if you can believe it). However, despite all that, she still won more than 2.8 MILLION votes than the Great Fizzle Himself did.

.

The Founding Fathers didn’t anticipate our having such a mess on our hands, since they worried about one candidate declaring himself king or the followers of another candidate chopping off heads right and left as they were doing in France.

.

The 25th Amendment even has deficiencies. If Trump were forced to resign, we’d still have President Pence, who may also be up to his neck in trouble. Ditto for Speaker Ryan. It is not an option for Hillary to be appointed as VP under Pence and then for him to resign. It would be the right thing to do, but no political party is capable of such selfless behavior.

.

A President Pence, however, could appoint a Mitt Romney or John McCain and then resign with the veep taking over the presidency.

.

Is all that going to happen? Of course not, we’re going to have the same old same-old until we are convinced we have died and are in a Jean Paul Sartre play. Our torment will go on and on, and a fool in the corner will be busy tweeting ‘SO SAD, SO BAD.’

**

OF INTEREST TO GRAMMARIANS -- If you are not a grammarian, then go away (so says the Forensic Grammarian).

.

In Latin and other languages, word order doesn’t matter because the endings or forms of nouns and pronouns will tell you whether something is a subject, a possessive, an indirect object, a direct object, etc.

.

In English, word order matters. Consequently, it is fairly rare to come across a sentence that will have this order: Direct object (DO), verb, and subject.

.

Behold and lo, I was reading one of Shakespeare’s sonnets and came across these two lines:

.

“I have seen roses damasked, red and white,

But no such roses see I in her cheeks.”

.

In the second line, “roses” is the DO, “see” the verb, and “I” the subject.

.

What? You say, “Big whoop?” Dammit, I told you not to read the posting if you weren’t a grammarian. Go to the board and write twenty-five times, “I will not pretend to be a grammarian.”

.

Grumble, grumble, grrrr.

**

HATE DONALD NO MATTER WHAT HE DOES? – That’s what the Great Fizzle Himself is telling people, but, no, Donald, it’s not a matter of whatever you do or have done.

.

It’s because of you and your character. As a Dem, I don’t hate Mitt Romney, John McCain, Bob Dole, Paul Ryan, Ted Cruz, or a dozen other potential GOP leaders.

.

You, Donald, are simply an icky human being. You are uninformed and convinced you know everything. You are a prime example of “hubris,” and the U.S. deserves better.

**

AH WELL -- Another one bites the dust. In my hometown, I generally preferred to go to K-Mart rather than Walmart. Now the choices in a small town decline even more. Belks is probably still at the mall, along with J. C. Penney. The town has lost its only theatre, due no doubt to competition from cable and red box rentals. Still certain flicks are meant to be seen on a big screen.

.

City fathers even sold the trousers off the statue of the Confederate soldier on the town square. He’s pathetic up there with his raggedy underwear.

**

NO NO NO -- I couldn’t vote for Chelsea Clinton . . . not until she has, say, posed nude for Playboy or Penthouse . . . been married three times . . . run a fraudulent university scheme . . . gotten tied up with the Russian mob . . . and forgotten the positive things she learned from her mum (her father might help her with the “babe” stuff). After all that, yes, maybe I could be ready for a left of center Trumpeeta.

**

CLEVER, DEVIOUS, & USING CHAOS? -- Some talking heads have been saying that the Great Fizzle Himself is using a clever strategy and a devious one (adapted from Putin’s playbook). He is using chaos to create a smokescreen to hide his more serious problems.

.

I beg to object.

.

The Fizzle is neither clever nor devious, and he is creating chaos simply because he is egotistical and inept. He has four bankruptcies to show that he doesn’t manage all that well.

.

Moreover, he comes to the presidency thinking that he is smarter than anyone else. Past presidents who wound up unexpectedly in the office realized their own deficiencies and often made certain that they had people around who could fill in wherever they were deficient.

.

“Know thyself” was a slogan on the Temple of Apollo at Delphi in ancient Greece, but the Temple of Trump would have a slogan saying, “I Know More Than Generals,” “I Know More than Members of Congress,” and “I Know More than Everyone.”

.

When he comes across as farcical (think Keystone Cops or The Three Stooges), we must keep in mind that he cannot be parodied. The ultimate joke begins and ends as a joke. Alex Baldwin, therefore, simply imitates what the Ultimate Fool does. Can you do a parody of the Three Stooges or the Keystone Cops? Nope, they too begin and end as jokes, as does the Great Fizzle Himself.

.

So sad for America, so bad for America.

.

**

MAKING & DOING ASSIGNMENTS -- As a teacher of college composition for nearly four decades full time, let me wade into this controversy: First, when an instructor makes an assignment, the student’s first reaction is often to find reasons not to do it. Some will even exert more effort getting out of assignments than actually doing the assignments would have cost.

.

There are many, many valid approaches to college assignments. One teacher has x-number of in-class writing days. You show up on a particular day, and Teach has put either a single topic on the board . . . or three topics (choose one). There is some value (not much actually) to the approach. It guarantees that the product turned in will be substandard.

.

Another approach is to announce each topic (or topics) beforehand, and the students may show up and write spontaneously or simply rewrite a draft they wrote at home. The product turned in will be better than the one only written in class.

.

I eventually went to giving out a list of, say, twenty topics, and the students could choose which ones they wanted to write. I tried to personalize them so that I wasn’t getting stuff reworked from Wikipedia. (A weasel will try to get around the topics. For example, one term, my “Problems of” topic came in as “Problems of Being a Clerical Assistant and a Single Mother at FSCJ.” The next term, her significant other tried unsuccessfully to palm the paper off as his. Grrrrr.)

.

One required topic was the New York Times paper. (If they wanted to go to the main Jacksonville library or to the University of North Florida library, they could use microfilm of other newspapers.)

.

Students would go to the NYT microfilm (and later to the online NYT) to look up issues of the NYT on the day they were born. Let’s say it was April 1, 1999. Then they’d have to look up the NYT on April 1 in one of the 9-years of the 19th Century: 1859, 1869, 1879, 1888, or 1899. Then they would choose another 9-year in the 20th or 21st century, say, 1969 or 2009. They would have to choose an area of focus: crimes, deaths by accidents, even obituaries, sports, entertainment (TV and movies in 1999 and radio, movies, and the stage in 1939), or advertisements.

.

They generally learned that people were wicked or careless in the 19th Century just as much as they were in the 20th and 21st Century.

.

The NYT assignment helped them to organize since I wanted five items from each year for 15 items total, plus a minimum of 1,500 words. (They usually wound up writing 2,000 to 2,300 words.

.

Especially when a college or university has discovered a new fad to impose upon its students, teachers don’t like to acknowledge that assignments similar to the ones that I make or the Iowa teacher made are journeymen writing. It will be rare for papers to really be worth reading a month or a year after a term has ended.

.

Oh, when I asked each class to fill out an anonymous feedback sheet about what changes to make in the course for the next term, they all wanted the NYT assignment to be dropped.

.

Never.

**

RANT AND RAVE – People often fuss about the average salaries of college football coaches compared to the pay of teachers or profs. . . or, in this case, about CEO’s and entertainers (or sports figures).

.

What they overlook is the transitory nature of jobs, especially the jobs of athletic coaches. They are here; if they don’t win (enough), they are gone. Sean Penn may earn $20 million, but the average actors / singers/ etc. usually have to have day jobs to make a living.

.

Moreover, the superstars have Time working against them. The problem with CEO pay is two- or three-fold: The corporate ethos has jacked up their compensation to ungodly heights. $1 million is a pittance for CEOs of ATT, etc.

.

Often they are paid, say, 500 times more than their average worker (which isn’t the case in other industrialized nations).

.

Even worse, they are often journeymen MBAs (at least) who neither created their respective companies nor know how to make anything themselves. They may leave after only a few months with platinum parachutes and no doubt believing they were worth every cent they received . . . unlike their lazy workers.

**

HB 11 & ALL THAT -- Every legislative session has its share of nonsense bills. HB11 for the 2017 session in Florida falls into this category when it says it wants members to pay for representation. Members of each union, of course, already pay dues, so, if a union membership is, say, 65% of the bargaining group, then they all pay for the dues. Moreover, since members generally use payroll deductions, the administrations know which employees are members of the union.

.

In theory, it is illegal for the employer to discriminate against the union membership.

.

If the lawmakers want to force the remaining 35% of employees to pay dues, it really doesn’t accomplish anything. They were “no” votes likely . . . or they voted “yes” and chose to get a free ride.

**

PALM PROPHECY -- I went to a palmist and she looked at my hands and announced I would live to be 76. Damn, she’s good.

**

CHOOSE YOUR ENEMIES CAREFULLY -- for you will become like them. Decades ago, I learned that line was attributed to humorist-actor Robert Benchley. (Try to trace it today, and your sources will credit everybody.) Maureen Dowd has an excellent column about why DT has gone down the toilet. He’s been played . . . he’s not as smart as Reagan . . . he’s got creeps around him.

**

Oh, Crazy Lipschitz of Waco got fired again. The boss claimed a highway patrolman pulled him over on some trumped up charge, and Crazy went berserk and took the branding iron to the boss. This time it was red hot.

--30--

Behold the Dinosaur: the Electoral College

Posted by Howard Denson on November 13, 2016 at 12:10 PM Comments comments (0)

By HOWARD DENSON

 

“If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” That’s a time-honored adage that discourages meddling and monkeying with things unnecessarily. It heads off the management types who crow that change is good, any change is good. Often it’s not.

..

On the other hand, there’s a corollary: “If it’s broke, fix it.” Quit trying to limp down the road using duct-tape and bailing wire to keep the vehicle together. Put in new fan belts, do a tune-up, buy new tires.

..

In the American political world, the Electoral College is not only obsolete, it’s also broken and cries out for demolition or repair.

..

The electoral college system has misfired six times in the country’s history, when presidential candidates with fewer national votes wound up in the White House. One of the most famous miscarriages of counting occurred when 1800 when Thomas Jefferson got past Aaron Burr to be president.

..

Twenty-four years later, Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams went at it, and, thanks to wheels and deals, Adams won the presidency and embittered Jackson, who later became our first psychopathic president.

..

Fifty-two years after that, a dust-up occurred when Democrat Samuel Tilden (with excellent credentials) won the popular vote but had the White House snatched away when Republican Rutherford B. Hayes essentially sold out Lincoln’s vision of Reconstruction by caving in to the demands of Southern politicos in exchange for their electoral votes.

..

A dozen years later, Benjamin Harrison slipped by the incumbent Grover Cleveland to become president before Cleveland messed up the sequential count of presidents by defeating him four years later.

..

Now, we have a break of 112 years when no serious problems emerged in the Electoral College vote counting. True, the Democrats may have pulled some fast ones in Chicago and Texas to get past Nixon (only to tempt him into emulating them in 1972). The popular vote was very close.

..

In 2000, of course, Al Gore won the popular vote, but, with the help of shenanigans in Florida and in the U.S. Supreme Court, George W. Bush got the office. He was likely to be an okay president, as his father had been. Unfortunately, Dubya was a doofus and helped to tear apart our country’s fiscal and military health.

..

Sixteen years later, we have Hillary Clinton currently with more popular votes than Donald Trump, who has been crowned as the president-elect. It remains to be seen if Der Fuhrer will be our second psychopatic president.

..

We have had FIVE presidential elections from 2000 to 2016, and forty percent of the time the system has NOT worked. The damned thing is broke, so let’s fix it or replace it.

..

--30--

 

Be Afraid, America, Very afraid

Posted by Howard Denson on November 11, 2016 at 2:25 PM Comments comments (0)

By HOWARD DENSON

 .

I have been on the losing sides of presidential elections many times in the past, but this time I am experiencing a new sensation: a definite fear for my country.

.

When I was seven in Vidalia, Georgia, I rooted for the Republican candidate Thomas E. Dewey against the incumbent, President Harry Truman. In truth, I didn’t know much about Dewey, but the “Stephenson circle” favored him, so I did too. I didn’t dislike Mr. Truman, partly because his voice was almost identical to Gene Autry’s, and you can’t pass up a connection like that. I wasn’t aware of the jab that Dewey looked like the man on the wedding cake, but I was a little disturbed because he looked too much like the villain in one of Gene’s pictures.

.

I was a big fan of General Eisenhower and got into my teens during his administrations. I grew to tolerate his quirky vice president, Richard Nixon. I didn’t know about Ike’s war-time fling with his female jeep driver, and I didn’t know about Mamie’s drinking. I wasn’t afraid of Adlai Stevenson for he seemed like a nice fellow. Years later, I was puzzled to learn that balding, pear-shaped Stevenson was a bit of a womanizer.


.I was a little too young to vote in the Nixon-Kennedy election, although I was all in favor of Nixon. Kennedy didn’t scare me, and it came as a shock later to learn that political scientists considered them almost identical in their positions.

.

Back then, it wasn’t appropriate for the media to pry into the presidents’ bedrooms, so I would have to wait for Victor Lasky’s JFK: The Man and the Myth to learn what dirt could be dished on him. (Ill Luck Dept.: JFK: The Man and the Myth is published, and he gets assassinated. Lasky’s RFK: The Myth and the Man is published, and he gets assassinated, too.)

.

I knew Barry Goldwater was going to lose in 1964 and was proud to be one of the 26 million who voted for him. He was a decent man, even if not the smartest senator in Washington. By contrast, I loathed Lyndon Johnson with his slick business deals and wheeling and dealing. I wasn’t aware that much of my animosity was being fed by my latent racism and lack of insight into what Johnson was trying to do. Still, I wasn’t afraid of him, just didn’t trust him or like him.

.

In 1968, I should have voted for Richard Nixon over exuberant and voluble Hubert Humphrey, but I was out of state at graduate school and knew that George Wallace was going to win both my home state and the state in which I was studying.

.

Considering that the war in Vietnam went on and on under Nixon, as he searched for a way to victory instead of an armistice, it would have been better if Humphrey had been elected in 1968, but a Democrat may not have been able to open diplomatic channels with China, thanks to the fall-out from the “Democrats lost China” attacks in the 1940s. I bought into the disdain directed at George McGovern in 1972 and didn’t research him enough to learn that he was a decorated World War II bomber pilot. This good man was closer to Audie Murphy than LBJ, Nixon, and Ford were.

.

I debated a long time in 1976 between Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. Ford was probably no smarter than Goldwater was (or your typical senator of any year), but he was an honorable man. Jimmy Carter was also a decent man, but, like Herbert Hoover and the Great Depression, ran into ill luck with high interest rates and the Iran hostage crisis.

.

In 1980, I voted for Reagan, even after years of being doubtful about his ability to do the job. The S&L crisis occurred during the administrations of RR and Bush 41, and, when I saw the sloppy, deceitful way that the GOP handled the scandal, I vowed to go with Democrats from then on or until the banking mess was cleaned up. It still isn’t and has only gotten worse.

.

Of course, Reagan was re-elected, defeating Walter Mondale, another good man, and then Bush the Elder and Wiser took over, defeating the quirky Michael Dukasis. Bush had been a fighter pilot in World War II and was filmed ditching his plane and being rescued.

.

I deserted Bush the Elder for the tom-cat from Arkansas, Bill Clinton, who, like Kennedy and Warren G. Harding, had trouble keeping his pants zipped. Bob Dole, a WW2 veteran, was a good man and a bulldog of a GOP attack dog.

.

In 2000, we had a choice between Al Gore and George W. Bush. I went with Al Gore since I am used to socially awkward politicos like Dukasis, Nixon, and most of the first six presidents. I didn’t fear Bush the Younger because I erroneously assumed that he would follow in the footsteps of his father. I couldn’t imagine his trying to do everything opposite from what 41 had done. A media riff back then was “who would you rather have a beer with, Gore or Bush?”

.

Some Americans stupidly went along with the notion that a pal could make a good president. As Sportin’ Life sings, “It ain’t necessarily so.”

.

An early supporter of Hillary, I switched to Barack Obama and have never regretted a moment of that support. I wasn’t afraid of John McCain or Mitt Romney. McCain, despite his temper, would do his duty if he had been elected president, and Romney was level-headed. In the Sixties, I was rooting for George Romney, who had been governor of Michigan and CEO of American Motors. Romney visited Vietnam and later said the generals had “brainwashed” him about the progress in the country. The media riffed on “do we want a president who could be brainwashed?” This time, the media helped to hand the election to Nixon.

.

And that brings us to Donald Trump, and the fact is this guy scares the daylights out of me, something that none of the previous presidential winners or losers did.

.

If you are an opponent, you will probably want to compare his rhetoric and that of his followers to Adolf Hitler. If so, you are missing the point. Hitler laid out what he was going to do in Mein Kampf, and, hours from his suicide in 1945, he wrote his last will and testament and essentially underscored what he had written in the 1920s. Few people, except for Churchill, were paying attention to what he was saying.

.

Trump probably can’t help himself, but he is an extreme narcissist. Now, every citizen who puts himself or herself forward as a possible president, senator, governor, or congressman has a hyper-ego.

.

But history provides us with hundreds of cautionary examples about the extreme narcissists. The one that we might fear most is not Hitler, but the Emperor Nero. He could be charming, talented as an amateur, but always self-centered. His egotism wearied the Romans after a bit. They even unjustly blamed him for the Great Fire and said he was plucking his lyre while the city burned. (He was elsewhere, but was delighted to have much of Rome cleared so he could build an amazing palace complex.)

.

If an Emperor was barking mad, as Caligula was, he would be quickly put down (four years). Commodus (twelve years), like Nero (fourteen years), had some positive features, but the city state was greatly relieved when these narcissists were visiting their relatives in the underworld.

.

We are unable to track the way Trump’s mind thinks because frankly it doesn’t. His supporters will bellow at such a canard, but Shakespeare has also been accused of not being much of a thinker. Instead, the Bard relied on his instincts and insights about human behavior.

.

Trump’s mind relies on trash-talk. His mind is not that of a Lincoln or Churchill, since he essentially is as incoherent as Bush the Younger, Andrew Johnson, and others. No, his mind is that of a traveling salesman who “rassles” on the side. He comes into a town and has a product to sell, and he will tell the mark anything, absolutely anything, to get the sucker to sign on the bottom line and fork over the green stuff.

.

Like Gorgeous George and Ali later, he crows that he is the greatest.

.

Trump does not have the ethics of Ulysses S. Grant, who let himself be seduced by the robber barons around him, nor of Harry S. Truman, who was wiped out during recessions in the 1920s. With his family in debt and dying from throat cancer, Grant forced himself to finish an outstanding autobiography whose sales saved his family’s prospects. It took time, but Truman paid off all of his debts.

.

What does a traveling huckster do? He files for bankruptcies, stiffs vendors on what is owed to them, and shafts employees by refusing to pay them.

.

Could that personality produce an effective president? It might in terms of foreign relations. Elizabeth I’s ministers cautioned the ministers from possible opposing countries, in effect, “My God, be careful what you do. She’s a hysterical woman and nobody can predict that she’ll do. Don’t upset her.”

.

Nixon liked for the North Vietnamese leaders in particular to think he was a bit unbalanced and God knows what he’ll do next.

.

As a long-time (largely ineffective) labor leader, I read books on management to understand how managers think. (If you are an effective manager, you don’t have to worry about your employees unionizing. If you are a bully and a tyrant, then you are also the best and primary organizer of a union.)

.

One rule of thumb cropped up over and over: “If you want to know what individuals will do [as an employee or CEO], look at what they have done in the past.”

.

With that standard in mind, America, be afraid. Be very afraid.

 .

--30--

 

 

The Cowboy Way

Posted by Howard Denson on October 25, 2016 at 2:55 PM Comments comments (0)


 

By HOWARD DENSON

 

She Who Knows All was disgusted about one of the political creatures and demanded that I write what men are really like. Despite her confidence in my ability to say something worthwhile, the world is not beating a path to my door to discover my insights into men and women and boys and girls.

.

One of my short stories, “The Magic of the Burning Boy,” deals in part with a boy learning from a friend about how babies come about. That element involved me as a fifth-grader (a 10-year-old), but I moved it to third-grader because I didn’t think that readers today would believe that a kid that old could be so obtuse. That was back in the Fifties, and most grownups in my limited universe just didn’t talk to kids about certain things.

.

About the time that Remedial Sex Info 0001 was occurring, a joke was going around. A father says to his son, “Georgie, I need to talk to you about the birds and bees,” and the son says, “Sure, Dad, what do you need to know?” We thought it funny although most of us didn’t know what Georgie would have to say.

.

Another story going around in the seventh and eighth grades involved three boys hiking through the woods when they hear moans in the bushes. The American boy whispers, “What are they doing?” The British boy gives him a look and shakes his head. “They’re making love.” A French boy sighs with disgust. “And doing it poorly.”

.

That joke doesn’t work today because nudity, porn, and sexuality are everywhere. All three boys would know what’s occurring, thanks to the porn site that’s off-limits to them or the disc that Uncle Elroy keeps hidden in his socks drawer. They are likely to be taking away unintended lessons:

.

*You meet someone and you do it within minutes, and that must be the way it is for everyone.

.

*You don’t have to worry about germs or precautions.

.

*The more the merrier.

.

*It’s just sex, no bigee.

.

*And other lessons that we need not detail here.

.

Although I wasn’t much of a Boy Scout (only made it to Bobcat in the Cubs and Tenderfoot in the Scouts) nor a cowboy, I grew up with the Scout-Cowboy Code: You were helpful, courteous, and kind; you were always prepared (although I often wasn’t); and you treated women, girls, and your elders with respect. It was the Cowboy Way, podner.

.

The converse of the above is also true: Grownups should be helpful, courteous, and kind and treat women, girls, men, boys, and youngsters with respect. Of course, grownups fall short in that ideal, just as a kid has trouble not raiding the cookie jar.

.

Today, we hear about locker room talk, what the guys say when they are by themselves. NFL, NBA, MLB athletes scoff at the notion and claim they talk only about stocks, bonds, childcare, etc. Since a MLB player will have about 150 games a year, it’s likely that any sex talk will soon exhaust itself.

.

It’s a mistake, however, to accept the notion that guys just talk about their finances and perhaps upcoming batters and pitchers. When we look at the sports teams of American colleges and universities, we see far too much sexual aggression in operation. We also see universities circling the wagons to protect their NCAA franchises. (Yes, we also instances of females trying to get their hands on future signing bonuses, etc.)

.

In the armed services, we have rampant sexual aggression, and the top brass have given lip-service to reforms but often failed to follow up with meaningful reforms.

.

When we look at males’ behavior, we end up drawing analogies with the research of Jane Goodall into chimpanzees and baboons. One primate decides he is now the Alpha male and goes to his chief competitor and bares his teeth, roars, etc. If the Alpha male roars back louder, the challenger moves off. However, if the Alpha male finally decides he doesn’t want to fight, he surrenders his spot and his prestige and moves over to dislodge the Beta male.

.

In the Sixties, when we loaded our National Guard infantry unit onto the buses to drive down to Camp Shelby, Mississippi, we started hearing, “Oh, I’m s-o-o-o horny!” Many of the guardsmen had only left their wives or girlfriends an hour or so before, but the ritual went on until we returned.

.

Trapped in the un-air conditioned barracks at Camp Shelby and no bus service into Hattiesburg, some horny guardsman dug out a 16mm projector and some black-and-white porn movies from the Twenties and Thirties. All participants wore Lone Ranger-style masks, and the women had on Mary Jane shoes and little else.

.

We have been hardwired to have sexual urges and to procreate. Nature (and God) instilled that to ensure that the species continued. When we sit on a park bench, we witness the hardwiring when a pigeon bumps into another pigeon, who turns away, only to have him continue bumping. Eventually he may try other pigeons or this female will decide that she is ready. They flutter around each other, and the species continues.

.

We can sugarcoat male aggression and claim that it is necessary for a boy bird and a girl bird to get together, but that aggression too often is transformed into misogyny. When a culture finds that a woman or girl has been raped, it demonstrates that it hates females when the men stone her and not the rapist.

.

When a culture demands that its females totally cover themselves and their faces, except for meshes, the males are demeaning themselves and announcing that they are incapable of looking at a female without trying to rape her.

.

Girls and women may participate in their own misogyny by asserting the most trivial of their equal rights but abandoning the high ground that can be most useful. A girl who apes the behavior of a testosterone-riddled male by throwing herself into a Debbie Does Dallas-situation does not break through any meaningful glass ceilings. Neither Debbie nor her role-model Donnie will stand out as natural leaders.

.

Americans are pulled this way and that as we discuss sex and sexuality. First, we have a puritanical streak that is dismayed at the sight of nudity, nude beaches, even nude statuary. We froth at the mouth at things that largely go unnoticed in European countries. In this respect, we are quite provincial.

.

Second, we grin at the sexual antics of some individuals and frown when others engage in similar antics. Errol can be in like Flynn, but Barney the barber might be run out of town.

.

Third, we may try to excuse the sexual behavior of the politically elite. The acts show the virility of our king, prime minister, or president. It may also reflect our culture’s acceptance of droit du seigneur (which generally translates as “right of the lord” and refers to a great one’s supposed right to lay with the bride of a serf or subordinate before her wedding night). Two problems quickly emerge: The droit du seigneur may have occurred more in plays, novels, and ballads than in reality. In addition, puritanical generations may have assumed that virginity was held in high regard in the ancient world and Middle Ages. (A duke’s daughter’s virginity could be a factor in a first-rate marriage, to a prince or a king; that of the blacksmith’s daughter may have been of little consequence.)

.

Past images of the sexually attractive can stick with us always. One anecdote from, say, Coronet magazine described an old World War I doughboy who fell from a ladder while hanging a picture. His wife asked him why he fell. He said, “I had a room in a hotel in a town not far from Paris and the maid came in and asked if I needed anything else. I told her I didn’t, and she asked again, and again, if there was anything else I wanted. . . And I just figured out what she was getting at.”

.

The hardwiring isn’t going to let us go, ever. In about 1980, my great-cousin Jimmie left Birmingham to move into her church’s retirement home in Jacksonville. I visited her fairly often (and learned many of the family secrets that had been kept from me for forty years).

.

One day, she was shocked, absolutely shocked at the behavior in the retirement home. “There’s a ninety-three-year-old man who is chasing after this eighty-eight-year-old woman. She rides this big tricycle, and he runs along behind her calling ‘Mona, Mona, Mona!’ It’s disgusting.”

.

Moral of the story: Follow the Cowboy Way and be a good Scout, but, even if you are helpful, courteous, and kind and strive not to be a predator, you are still going to embarrass yourself. You’re hardwired that way.

.

--30--

 

Looking to Future Presidential Elections?

Posted by Howard Denson on October 14, 2016 at 12:45 AM Comments comments (0)


 

By HOWARD DENSON

.

The 2015-16 election cycle has been one of the silliest in modern history. It may be that, with Facebook, Twitter, and similar tools, we will have a new norm: all outrageous illogic, shouting matches of lie against lie, etc. If so, that does not mean we will have a better country. What we have at present is a sick nation. Those with negative intentions immerse us in a warped perspective about who we are and where we are going.

..

All parties like to cry, “This is the most important election in our country’s history.” Often it’s not since what they mean is, “This is the current election.”

.

The U.S. would have done all right if Tom Dewey had defeated Truman in 1948 . . . if Adlai Stevenson had defeated Ike . . . if Nixon had defeated JFK . . . and so on.

.

When we have a healthy country, either party’s candidate has been a reasonable person who could plot the country on a sensible course.

.

They certainly had their crazies in past years, with 1948 being outstanding. It featured Strom Thurmond heading the Dixiecrats with racism to surpass what we have seen today.

.

Talking heads like to compare this election to 1964’s, when Barry Goldwater was the GOP standard bearer. That, of course, is way off base. Barry knew he wasn’t going to win and described himself as a kamikaze pilot since there was no way the country could go from JFK up to November 1963, LBJ from November until the election a year later, and then the swearing in of Goldwater in January 1965. Three presidents in that short of time? Not going to happen.

.

If it mattered (and it didn’t), Goldwater erred in answering a reporter’s question about how atomic bombs could be used in Southeast Asia. Barry, an Air Force general in the reserves, gave a reasonable answer from a military college standpoint of discussion of tactics and strategy . . . and suddenly ads were showing bombs going off while a little girl picked flowers. Barry was a gentleman and totally non-partisan in his civilian capacities. As a C.B. operator, he could carry on cordial conversations with an FDR liberal  (a friend’s liberal father had regularly conversations with him).

.

In 1968, an A-bomb advocate might have been George Wallace’s running mate, General Curtis LeMay, who headed the massive bombings of Japanese cities during World War II.

.

As I argue that we cannot continue doing what we’re doing, I’m not opening the door to a First Amendment Gestapo, but we do have to stand upright the figure of Sanity and Truth. The 1960 debates provided a standard. The Democrats and Republicans had different perspectives about what facts meant, but they were closer together than what we have witnessed for months now.

.

So . . .

.

Step #1 in making America sane again is to promote truth and accuracy. That means all parties need to participate in truth-vetting. The goal is to exclude candidates who lie 80-90 percent of the time.

.

We are all paranoid, so a NON-PARTISAN fact-checking group should be established and set up rules that will be followed by all candidates from major and minor parties.

.

100% Truth is unlikely since some positions are simply matters of perspective. A good example here is the difference between pro- and anti-abortion. Each side will argue that their position is correct. However, if one side argues that abortion is increasing in the U.S., while statistics say it is decreasing, then a flag could be thrown.

.

In addition, we will have some issues concerning which we can't measure the accuracy or truth index. Climate change may fall into this area. A truth index may deflect arguments about the accuracy of climate change toward the reality of states having to cope with rising coastal waters, loss of wetlands, increased floods, etc.

.

A Scrooge McNutt may revel in his billions and back a candidate who has a truth index of 10%. He may get the candidate of his choice to use fiery but reckless rhetoric.

 “Never in the history of our country have we seen such tyranny and injustice!” That doesn’t jibe with what occurred before, during, and after the Civil War.

.

Let's say that we will NOT respect nor acknowledge a candidate who is lying more than, say, 20-30% of the time. That doesn’t set the bar very high, but it allows wiggle room for matters that may be simply individuals’ opinions.

.

If a candidate has a truth index of 50-60%, then he or she is penalized. It won't matter if Scrooge McNutt is backing him to the hilt. The parties could be encouraged to deny him or her funds for any campaigns. If the parties refuse to do so, then the candidates certainly could be ruled ineligible to participate in any debates between the major party candidates.

.

The truth index might result in, say, only two individuals on the stage for a party debate. Lincoln and Douglas, and JFK and Nixon, proved that two candidates can provide a fine debate. To cut out the childish interruptions that we are seeing too much of, the debate organizers might borrow an approach from the Golden Age of Quiz Shows. Candidate A is in his or her isolation chamber and speaks for two minutes on a topic. The mike is then turned off, and Candidate B gets to speak uninterrupted for two minutes from inside an isolation chamber.

.

For the final debates before the November election, candidates from the minor parties would fill out the debate platform. It shouldn’t matter that they had support from only three to eight percent of the electorate. If their Truth Index were high enough, it would entitle them to a podium on the stage.

.

Will the suggestions work?

.

Of course not.


What will happen then?


For starters, pieces like this will be written asking what rough beast, its hour come around at last, creeps toward Washington to be born.

--30--

 


Rss_feed